Dominik Kellovsky vs Edison Ambarzumjan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Who's more accurate on second serve? Dominik Kellovsky currently wins 43.67% of points on their second serve, slightly trailing behind Edison Ambarzumjan who wins 45.47%.
• In recent return games, Kellovsky displays strength, winning 49.08% of his opponent's second serve points, surpassing Ambarzumjan's 42.39%.
• When considering first serve returns: Kellovsky wins 30.82% of points, edging out Ambarzumjan's 29.81%.
• Which player handles pressure better? Ambarzumjan excels in saving breakpoints with a 60.23% success rate, compared to Kellovsky's 51.17%.
• Over the past year, Kellovsky has a superior match win percentage at 60.00%, while Ambarzumjan stands at 47.37%.
• Kellovsky performs best on hard surfaces with a career win rate of 58%, whereas Ambarzumjan has the same percentage on grass courts.
• Which matches have they mostly played? Both players frequently compete in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Kellovsky having a higher win ratio at 65.85% versus Ambarzumjan's 47.37%.
• Kellovsky has faced opponents with an average rank of 393.87, while Ambarzumjan's competitors have an average rank of 171.63 over the last year.
• If the match progresses to a deciding set, Kellovsky is likely favored, having won 70% of deciding sets compared to Ambarzumjan's 27%.
• Regarding break point conversion, Ambarzumjan converts 41.77% of chances, faring better than Kellovsky's 30.37%.

Editorial Prediction (November 15, 2025, UTC):

When evaluating recent form and statistical strengths, the match between Dominik Kellovsky and Edison Ambarzumjan reveals interesting dynamics. Kellovsky displays superior return game abilities, particularly on his opponent's second serves. However, Ambarzumjan demonstrates resilience under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints.

Moreover, Kellovsky's recent match win-rate and consistency on hard courts give him a competitive edge over Ambarzumjan, who is equally proficient on grass but has a lower overall win percentage. Additionally, Kellovsky's success in deciding sets might be critical if the match intensifies.

Though Ambarzumjan has an advantage in break point conversions, the broader statistical narrative and Kellovsky's superior head-to-head performance indicators suggest he is more likely to emerge as the winner of this encounter.